https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|anto.tra...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) |
--- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1269538 (IoT) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
--- Comment #7 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) |
--- Comment #8 from Mamoru TASAKA -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mtas...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #10 from Eric Smith ---
In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment 8:
I most certainly CAN choose not to review a package for any arbitrary reason,
including that I can't build it locally. IF I don't want to review packages
that have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #11 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
(In reply to Eric Smith from comment #10)
> In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment 8:
>
You have to follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
Usually I
- do "ping" every
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #12 from Eric Smith ---
I didn't mark FE-DEADREVIEW suddenly. The previous reviewer did. I only
restored it after it was improperly removed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #13 from Eric Smith ---
Since I need libiio myself and am fed up with waiting for anything to happen,
I've fixed the package myself. I don't much care whether the original packager
uses what I've done or not, but in case they want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson ---
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #9)
> By the way:
>
> * Latest version
> - 0.10 is now available.
>
> * License tag
> - Although "README.md" says this is under LGPLv2+,
> "mainpage.dox"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter |
--- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1269538 (IoT)
Referenced Bugs:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson ---
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #16)
> Well,
>
> * My recommendation is that -doc and python3-iio subpackage should be marked
> as noarch and remove arch-specific %{?_isa} part (i.e. use Require
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1482246
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libiio
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. La
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson ---
> - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
> (~1MB) or number of files.
> Note: Documentation size is 1290240 bytes in 113 files.
> See:
> http://fedoraproject.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #2)
>
> > - __pycache__ looks not recognized as property of this package
>
> What do you mean by that?
It was present and not packaged.
>
> > - You don't need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande ---
Build fails; are you sure that python*- packages are noarch?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18607371
"The following noarch package built differently on different architectures:
pytho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||space...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from E
25 matches
Mail list logo
