https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
reg-0.4.1-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
reg-0.4.1-5.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #24 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
reg-0.4.1-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3d65fc4670
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
reg-0.4.1-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #21 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
reg-0.4.1-3.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cf91759923
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
reg-0.4.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
reg-0.4.1-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f1099cbe6a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
reg-0.4.1-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ebf1727379
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/reg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #13 from Adam Miller ---
Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/reg.spec
SRPM URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/reg-0.4.1-1.src.rpm
scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20002741
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #12 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Adam Miller from comment #11)
> (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #9)
> > Generic:
> > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
> > other leg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #11 from Adam Miller ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #9)
> Generic:
> [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
> other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #10 from Adam Miller ---
(In reply to Jan Chaloupka from comment #8)
> Could you provide the following header in the spec (some of it is already
> there)?
>
> %global provider_prefix github.com/jessfraz/reg
> %global import_path
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #9 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jchal...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ra...@electronsweatshop.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #6 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
review as per fedora-review:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Sources used to buil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|admil...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ra...@electronswe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #3 from Adam Miller ---
Updated items listed above that I said I would, I'm still not 100% sure what to
do about the bundling just yet as well as the license checks.
Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/reg.spec
SRPM U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(admiller@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||admil...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
32 matches
Mail list logo