https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-04d6090cf2
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libdxflib
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to srakitnican from comment #7)
> I am actually wondering why it depends on Qt at all, I thought it is using
> it just for the build system.
Maybe.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #8 from srakitnican ---
This is much more like it:
$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-25-x86_64/result/libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
/sbin/ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
libc.so.6()(64bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #7 from srakitnican ---
I am actually wondering why it depends on Qt at all, I thought it is using it
just for the build system.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #6 from srakitnican ---
Under the same name/path?
I am asking because here's the case that library is called exactly the same for
both qt4 and qt5, in that case packages would conflict, is that OK?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to srakitnican from comment #4)
> Thank you for your review!
>
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> > SPEC url is not reachable with Fedora tools, please use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #4 from srakitnican ---
Thank you for your review!
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> SPEC url is not reachable with Fedora tools, please use that one from copr
> or a direct link to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
SPEC url is not reachable with Fedora tools, please use that one from copr or a
direct link to the file as a plain text.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
srakitnican changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1432983
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
srakitnican changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
25 matches
Mail list logo