https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #23 from Iwicki Artur ---
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the GNOME Software Center simply looks at
the License: tag in the RPM and makes a free/proprietary distinction based on
that.
I checked the tag in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #22 from rugk <7d28c...@opayq.com> ---
Yet another thing: Why is it marked as "proprietary" in the software center? I
think all source code is freely available.
Also the German translation in the app description is missing. Can I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #21 from rugk <7d28c...@opayq.com> ---
Great! Thanks for all your work!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #20 from Iwicki Artur ---
Said metadata is present in the package - it's the .appdata.xml file. It's just
that Fedora doesn't immediately rebuilt the catalog for GNOME Software - it's
done periodically, every
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #19 from rugk <7d28c...@opayq.com> ---
Can we somehow get it into GNOME software? AFAIK just somemetadata is needed
for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
whichwayisup-0.7.9-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
whichwayisup-0.7.9-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
whichwayisup-0.7.9-3.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e705f0a2fe
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
whichwayisup-0.7.9-3.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-61c13c84db
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/whichwayisup
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Wart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Wart changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w...@kobold.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #9 from Andrea Musuruane ---
Spec URL: https://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/whichwayisup.spec
SRPM URL: https://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/whichwayisup-0.7.9-3.fc25.src.rpm
Changelog:
- Added missing BR
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
rugk <7d28c...@opayq.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||7d28c...@opayq.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane ---
Thanks Neal, I totally forgot about fedorapeople.org :-/
Spec URL: https://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/whichwayisup.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane ---
(In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #2)
> Some other hints on the spec-file:
>
> > URL:http://www.oletus.fi/static/whichwayisup/
> > Source0:
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane ---
(In reply to Iwicki Artur from comment #1)
> Ha, I was just finishing packaging this. If you're interested, you can take
> a look at my package here:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
--- Comment #3 from Iwicki Artur ---
Björn, regarding macros for system executables, the packaging guidelines
actually say to avoid them:
> Macro forms of system executables SHOULD NOT be used except when there is a
> need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Iwicki Artur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464778
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1364745
26 matches
Mail list logo