https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
R-base64enc-0.1.3-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
R-base64enc-0.1.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
R-base64enc-0.1.3-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3516f3975f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
R-base64enc-0.1.3-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-687199f3f4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-base64enc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #8 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Are they arch or noarch? Because the libR.so dep from the shared library should
pull in R-core automatically as a Requires (try installing from the copr).
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
R-core is not an alias for R-devel. R-core is 55MB while R-devel is 30ko.
I'm pretty certain it's a Requires: R-core not a BuildRequires, that's how
other R packages I've looked at handle it.
For t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Oh, looking at fedora-review, I think it's actually talking about
BuildRequires. But it means I should use R-core instead of R because it's
smaller. However, R-devel appears to be an alias of R-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #5 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
The last time the R guidelines were updated was in
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/535 where DESCRIPTION was moved
from %doc, but not NEWS, so I assume that's where they want it to b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
It seems to be the case for your other R packages (I have R-mime on standby),
could you do a check of the other R packages? For NEWS, maybe Fedora-review is
not up to speed to the latest Guidelines,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Hmm, that seems to be the way that R2spec generated it. At least NEWS seems
consistent with the R guidelines pages. Unfortunate that R-core is not added
automatically.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ASSIGNED
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485591
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
17 matches
Mail list logo
