[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- nim-0.17.2-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fdd61480bc -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 Bug 1511632 depends on bug 1512228, which changed state. Bug 1512228 Summary: Review Request: nim-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Nimble source packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512228 What|Removed

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nim. You may commit to the branch "f27" in about 10 minutes. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 --- Comment #7 from Sergey Avseyev --- I have updated file list and added more fixes and enhancements, like forcing Fedora hardened compiler flags, building HTML docs, extracting optional tools into separate package

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 Bug 1511632 depends on bug 1512228, which changed state. Bug 1512228 Summary: Review Request: nim-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Nimble source packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512228 What|Removed

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 Bug 1511632 depends on bug 1512228, which changed state. Bug 1512228 Summary: Review Request: nim-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Nimble source packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512228 What|Removed

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 --- Comment #6 from Sergey Avseyev --- I have created separate another package in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512228, and now I will try to buildroot-override to rebuild this package -- You are

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 Sergey Avseyev changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1512228

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- See what I posted above: remove the %dir and remove the asterisk after the directories: %files %license copying.txt dist/nimble/license.txt %doc %{_docdir}/nim/ %{_bindir}/nim*

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 --- Comment #4 from Sergey Avseyev --- I see. I haven't packaged any library which using nim-specific package distribution (nimble), but I was going to do it. It makes sense to do before compiler itself will be

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- I don't see any changes in %files. I didn't mean you should add the macros to this package, you could create a separate package, like nim-packaging, for the macros. I don't know

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 --- Comment #2 from Sergey Avseyev --- Thank you for your notes. I've fixed file list, and added macro, although nim.spec itself still using ExcludeArch. I believe later, macro file will be transferred to

[Bug 1511632] Review Request: nim - statically typed, imperative programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511632 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|