https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System ---
molsketch-0.5.1-7.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #41 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #40)
> 32-bit OpenBabel has been available since last August, so this can't be
> right.
I meant the last build of OpenBabel.
Btw, I have just instal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #40 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Hi Antonio,
There are these warning messages in Bodhi:
The update can not be pushed: 1 of 1 required tests failed
The failing test is dist.rpmdeplint and this is the explanation:
results:
- ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
molsketch-0.5.1-7.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #38 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #37 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
I just did.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #36 from Antonio Trande ---
Why not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #35 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Antonio, do you think that I should add Molsketch (and/or SciDAVis) to the
comps XML file under "Engineering and Scientific"?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
molsketch-0.5.1-7.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c755bcbeff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
molsketch-0.5.1-7.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6ccf2bb289
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #32 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/molsketch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #31 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Thank you very much Antonio!
Once again, it's been very educational.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this prod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #30 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #29 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Built from the newest snapshot, source for OpenBabel interface removed from
devel subpackage.
Spec URL: https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/Molsketch/molsketch.spec
SRPM URL:
https://alexpl.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #28 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Spec URL: https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/Molsketch/molsketch.spec
SRPM URL:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/Molsketch/molsketch-0.5.1-6.fc28.src.rpm
rawhide scratch build:
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #27 from Antonio Trande ---
Created attachment 1393272
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1393272&action=edit
Patch for installation of header files
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #26 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #25)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #24)
> > - Openbabel features do not work yet.
>
> Sorry about the mess, I had been using 2 different machi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #25 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #24)
> - Openbabel features do not work yet.
Sorry about the mess, I had been using 2 different machines plus koji and I
mixed up my files. That's why the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #24 from Antonio Trande ---
- Openbabel features do not work yet.
- ldconfig scriplets are not needed if you install libraries in a private
directory.
- /usr/lib64/molsketch directory is not owned.
Use the line
%{_libdir}/%{na
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #23 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
New builds, after Hendrik's update.
I've also remembered to use %ldconfig_scriptlets.
Spec URL: https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/Molsketch/molsketch.spec
SRPM URL:
https://alexpl.fedorapeo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #22 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Also, I installed molsketch and all its subpackages in mock (built using the
same spec file as in koji build 24441314) and there were no errors:
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --install
/var/lib/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #21 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #7)
> >- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> > Note: molsketch-debugsource :
> > /usr/src/debug/molsketch-0.5.1-2.fc28.x86_64/libmolsketch/Te
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #20 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Created attachment 1386508
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1386508&action=edit
Fresh installation on default Live Workstation
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #18)
> (I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #19 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Created attachment 1386274
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1386274&action=edit
New user with defaults
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #18)
> It does not work to me.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #18 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #15)
> Created attachment 1386243 [details]
> Features with unversioned libraries packaged
>
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14)
> > If this bi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #17 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #16)
> What's the output from command-line of your "working" molsketch?
$ molsketch-qt5
Info: ((null):0, (null)) Clearing list of molecules. Count: 0
Warni
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #16 from Antonio Trande ---
What's the output from command-line of your "working" molsketch?
$ molsketch-qt5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #15 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Created attachment 1386243
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1386243&action=edit
Features with unversioned libraries packaged
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14)
> If t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #14 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #12)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
> > Can you post the output of
> >
> > $ ldd -r /usr/bin/molsketch-qt5
> >
> > ?
>
> linux-vds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #13 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Btw, that's from the last build with all the libraries -versioned &
unversioned- packaged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #12 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
> Can you post the output of
>
> $ ldd -r /usr/bin/molsketch-qt5
>
> ?
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffc76bb)
libmolsketch-qt5.so.0 => /lib64/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #10)
> Caught it:
>
> diff 0.5.1-4/molsketch.spec 0.5.1-4b/molsketch.spec
> 90c90
> < %{_libdir}/lib*.so.*
> ---
> > %{_libdir}/lib*.so*
>
> If I revert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Caught it:
diff 0.5.1-4/molsketch.spec 0.5.1-4b/molsketch.spec
90c90
< %{_libdir}/lib*.so.*
---
> %{_libdir}/lib*.so*
If I revert that line to how it was before, it works. How should I proceed?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #7)
> (In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #6)
> > The 0.5.1-4 build is missing the requirement on
> > libobabeliface-qt5.so.0()(64bit). But how di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Created attachment 1385256
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1385256&action=edit
OpenBabel-dependent features
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #7)
> (In reply to Alexander
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #6)
> I ran a side by side comparison of the 0.5.1-2 and 0.5.1-4 x86_64 builds and
> I found the difference:
>
> Processing files: molsketch-0.5.1-2.fc28.x8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
I ran a side by side comparison of the 0.5.1-2 and 0.5.1-4 x86_64 builds and I
found the difference:
Processing files: molsketch-0.5.1-2.fc28.x86_64
[…]
Requires: libGL.so.1()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
$ diff 0.5.1-2/molsketch.spec 0.5.1-4/molsketch.spec
3c3
< Release:2%{?dist}
---
> Release:4%{?dist}
5c5
< License:GPLv2
---
> License:GPLv2+
16d15
< BuildRequires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> - Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides libmolsketch-qt5 needed by
> molsketch-devel-0.5.1-3.fc28.x86_64
>
> Remove
>
> 'R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
- Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libmolsketch-qt5 needed by
molsketch-devel-0.5.1-3.fc28.x86_64
Remove
'Requires: lib%{name}-qt5'
-
>The OpenSUSE spec file also listed li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Hello Antonio and thanks for taking this review request.
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1)
> - Are you sure that 'qca' (or qca-qt5?) is required for building?
Not really and neither wa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
- Are you sure that 'qca' (or qca-qt5?) is required for building?
- Make arch-specific the 'openbabel' explicit request:
Requires: openbabel%{?_isa}
- devel subpackage requires the main package (that c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
45 matches
Mail list logo
