https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
--- Comment #12 from Stefan Koch ---
Because of a rpmgrill.manifest error I have moved the usbauth-npriv binary from
bindir to libexecdir:
"/usr/bin/usbauth-npriv", "Owned by group 'usbauth'; files in /usr/bin
must be group 'root'", "subpackag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/usbauth-notifier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Koch ---
Thank you for the good example. The build 895957 does not use hardcoded paths
anymore. Have you found one?
Commit:
https://github.com/kochstefan/usbauth-all/commit/76ee5774b0d8f1d1281720dba01db421a86f8f83
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Koch ---
The referenced package guidelines say:
"The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard does not include any provision for
libexecdir, but Fedora packages MAY store appropriate files there. Libexecdir
(aka, /usr/libexec o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
I don't see how the number of files is relevant, if the code contains archful
data you need to put it in %{_libdir}, if the files are noarch, then it goes
into %{_datadir}. If it's a binary, put it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Koch ---
I have added a revised build at:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kochstefan/usbauth-all/build/893247
usbauth-notifier is currently installed to
/usr/lib/usbauth-notifier/usbauth-notifier because of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
%files -f %name.lang
%files
- Squash this into one statement:
%files -f %name.lang
- This should not be needed:
%_datadir/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/usbauth-notifier.mo
It should be included in %
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Koch ---
I have added an new revised build at:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kochstefan/usbauth-all/build/849748
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Sorry to have forgotten you.
- Please space out your changelog entry, they are difficult to read
- I would rather have you not mix Suse stuff with Fedora stuff.
- Install the license file with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
Stefan Koch changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
Stefan Koch changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554022
Stefan Koch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
See Also|
16 matches
Mail list logo
