https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
Alain V. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #16 from Alain V. ---
Upstream releases a new version.
I changed the .spec file, generate a srpm file, then perform again
$ fedpgk import
This creates a tar.gz file in my git dir, and I did commit this file.
https://src.fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pcb-rnd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #13 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
No need for Copr, just show me the updated SPEC.
The next step for you is to find a sponsor, introduce yourself to the devel
mailing list and do informait reviews to show that you understand the
g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Yes, rpmlint is not a perfect tool, sometimes it says there are errors when it
is in fact acceptable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #11 from Alain V. ---
I would have done so if only a warning was generated. I thought an error was
not negligible, and made every effort to have no error, no warning with
rpmlint.
You say: better have an error, but use %{_prefix}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
> then rpmlint complains with an error: pcb-rnd.spec:3: E:
> hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/%{name}/plugins
The rpmlint error doesn't matter, we can choose to ignore it.
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #9 from Alain V. ---
Sorry, I went too fast, did not mention the issue arises due to rpmlint error,
so please, rewind:
pcb-rnd.spec file, line 3, if I change %{_usr} to become %{_prefix}, line 3
reads now:
%global plugindir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Alain V. from comment #7)
> I propose those modifications in .spec file:
>
> 1. licenses breakdown: Add this comment line before the License: tag
> # For a license breakdown info, plea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #7 from Alain V. ---
I propose those modifications in .spec file:
1. licenses breakdown: Add this comment line before the License: tag
# For a license breakdown info, please refer to
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Still not fixed:
- Add a comment explaining the licenses breakdown:
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
- Use %{_prefix} instead of %{_usr}
- Shouldn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #5 from Alain V. ---
Thank you very much for this detailed analysis, Robert-Andre.
Today, a new pcb-rnd release is available [1], and I successfully built Fedora
packages [2] (+RHEL + Mageia) with a modified .spec file, following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Using SPEC URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/avigne/pcb-rnd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00763485-pcb-rnd/pcb-rnd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/avigne/p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Yes on the devel list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
--- Comment #2 from Alain V. ---
Than you so much Robert-André for this valuable feed-back.
I implemented most of your proposals, 2 of them I can't at the moment:
1. ./configure is NOT the autotool configure binary we might all expect. Thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
Alain V. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced Bugs:
20 matches
Mail list logo