[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-07-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 --- Comment #7 from Mohan Boddu --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nng -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson --- (In reply to Pavel Zhukov from comment #4) > (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > > > I can fix them on commit. > OK. > > > > Well they're all development API docs as opposed to generic docs

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Zhukov --- (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > I can fix them on commit. OK. > > Well they're all development API docs as opposed to generic docs a standard > use might want hence the reason I put them

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson --- (In reply to Pavel Zhukov from comment #2) > looks good. Few cosmetic things: > - Summary is not capitalized > - Trailing whitespaces in description I can fix them on commit. > Isn't it better to

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Zhukov --- looks good. Few cosmetic things: - Summary is not capitalized - Trailing whitespaces in description Isn't it better to package html files in -doc subpackage? They consume 8.6Mb from total of 8.8 and most

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pzhu...@redhat.com Flags|

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1572709 (mozgw) Referenced Bugs: