https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
Marc-Andre Lureau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #27 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/swtpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #25 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #24)
> (In reply to Stefan Berger from comment #21)
> > (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #18)
> > > > python3 doesn't seem to create the symlin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #24 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Stefan Berger from comment #21)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #18)
> > > python3 doesn't seem to create the symlink of python to the python3
> > > executable. > So
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #23 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #17)
> - remove the duplicated "License: BSD" lines, the top-level one is enough
Actually added a license to the -devel package.
>
> - use regular section ord
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #22 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #20)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #17)
> > >- dist'ing libswtpm_libtpms.so in -devel is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #21 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #18)
> > python3 doesn't seem to create the symlink of python to the python3
> > executable. > So I have to use python2.
> > Actually, I need python as well
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #20 from Marc-Andre Lureau ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #19)
> (In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #17)
> >- dist'ing libswtpm_libtpms.so in -devel isn't useful if you don't provide a
> >header & stab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #19 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #17)
>- dist'ing libswtpm_libtpms.so in -devel isn't useful if you don't provide a
>header & stable API to use it.
I don't see why this would be a prob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #18 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
> python3 doesn't seem to create the symlink of python to the python3
> executable. > So I have to use python2.
> Actually, I need python as well. It seems to be the one setting the symlink.
> I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #17 from Marc-Andre Lureau ---
- remove the duplicated "License: BSD" lines, the top-level one is enough
- no need to duplicate %doc & %license for each pacakge
- use regular section order, %files come just before %changelog (th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #16 from Stefan Berger ---
> Done.
>
>
> >
> > - Own this directory:
> >
> > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
> > Note: No known owner of /usr/share/swtpm
>
>
> I do not know what to do abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #15 from Stefan Berger ---
Actually, I need python as well. It seems to be the one setting the symlink. I
suppose it will set a different symlink once python3 takes over?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #14 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #13)
>and:
>
> %prep
> %autosetup -n %{name}-%{gitcommit}
Cool! Thanks. I am using this now.
>
>
>
>then download the source with "spectool -g s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #13 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Why not use a direct link for the tar.gz?
%global gitdate 20180918
%global gitcommit be6b378487548bc197bbf9fa39a01f628839a22f
%global gitshortcommit %(c=%{gitcommit}; echo ${c:0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #12 from Stefan Berger ---
> Tbh, I think having a shared library for swtpm isn't really worth it. It
> may create problems, not really solve any. I would rather link the common
> objects to the final binaries.
>
> Otherwise,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #11 from Stefan Berger ---
The latest spec is now here again:
https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm/blob/tpm2-preview.v2.selinux/dist/swtpm.spec
I removed the remaining 'Group' line, added details about how to get Source0,
fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Add a URL: field
- Source0 must be d/l from a URL, if it's not possible details the
instructions to create the archive
- Group is not used in Fedora
- your changelog entry should contain y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
Marc-Andre Lureau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment #9 from Marc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #7)
> %bcond_with gnutls will disable gnutls by default. Are you sure you don't
> want the opposite, %bcond_without gnutls?
Thanks. I fixed this now. I don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
%bcond_with gnutls will disable gnutls by default. Are you sure you don't want
the opposite, %bcond_without gnutls?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
Stefan Berger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(stef...@us.ibm.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #4 from Iñaki Ucar ---
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #3)
> (In reply to Iñaki Ucar from comment #2)
> > And swtpm depends on libtpms >= 0.6.0, but current version is 0.5.2.
>
> is there a way to scratch-build against
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #3 from Marc-Andre Lureau ---
(In reply to Iñaki Ucar from comment #2)
> And swtpm depends on libtpms >= 0.6.0, but current version is 0.5.2.
is there a way to scratch-build against another scratch-build? or should tpms
0.6 need t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
Iñaki Ucar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.uca...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
Marc-Andre Lureau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stef...@us.ibm.com
Fla
28 matches
Mail list logo
