[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Patrik Kopkan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #17 from Miro Hrončok --- Don't be :) It's perfectly OK to not now everything from the beginning (or ever). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #16 from Jan Macku --- I'm sorry. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ pac

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #15 from Miro Hrončok --

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Jan Macku changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #14 from Jan Macku --- Patrik, do you still want to maintain this package? If so, this package is in my opinion ready to be in Fedora. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok --- > Although there is some library for spinners using that. I don't think this should influence the decision whether to package cursor or not. The primary motivation for this was pipenv. pipenv stopped usi

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #12 from Patrik Kopkan --- I would drop it. Although there is some library for spinners using that. I warned the upstream about changed in license https://github.com/manrajgrover/halo/issues/118 -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok --- Patrik, see https://github.com/sarugaku/vistir/pull/58 and consider whether you wont to maintain this package anyway or not. It will not be needed for pipenv. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Patrik Kopkan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(pkop...@redhat.co | |m)

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #9 from Jan Macku --- Ok, this looks like easy to use tool, so man pages aren't mandatory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and comp

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok --- BTW In my experience, contacting upstream about missing manpages is mostly waste of packagers and upstreams time. Only do it if you really want to have them. Several notes by me: 1) Use dot at the end of

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Jan Macku changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(pkop...@redhat.co

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Patrik Kopkan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(pkop...@redhat.co | |m)

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Jan Macku changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pkop...@redhat.com Flags|

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #4 from Patrik Kopkan --- Spec URL: https://pagure.io/python-cursor/raw/master/f/python-cursor.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/python-cursor/raw/master/f/python-cursor-1.2.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Rebuilt with gpl license. I am sorry fo

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #3 from Jan Macku --- Hi Patrik, URL to your SRPM package download html document not SRPM package, can you please post correct URL? Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedor

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Jan Macku changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jama...@redhat.co | |m)

[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jama...@redhat.com, |