[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- paperwork-1.2.4-2.fc29, python-paperwork-backend-1.2.4-1.fc29, python-pycountry-18.5.26-1.fc29, python-pyocr-0.6-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist,

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedo

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from F

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedo

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from F

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-paperwork-backend -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - It would be nice to build the doc, provided by the upstream archive, not pipy. Package approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = N

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC|

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1692303 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1692218] Review Request: python-paperwork-backend - Paperwork's backend

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692218 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33753150 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified ab