https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
howl-0.6-10.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
howl-0.6-10.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #20 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-f1f65a9d18 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f1f65a9d18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/howl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #15 from Artem ---
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl-0.6-9.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #14 from Artem ---
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl-0.6-8.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #13 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
1. You need to move to -data subpackage only contents of %{_datadir}/%{name}
directory. All others (especially manifest and desktop file) should be placed
in main package.
%files
%doc README.md Changelo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from Vitaly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #11 from Artem ---
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl-0.6-7.fc30.src.rpm
Apologize for delay. Can we bundle it for now and in future releases fix th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #10 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
> Unbundle LuaJIT will be not so easy
Fedora already has required 2.1 beta 3. You can unbundle it manually by
removing it's directory on %prep stage and fixing build paths to follow
packaged version.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #9 from Artem ---
Unbundle LuaJIT will be not so easy
https://github.com/howl-editor/howl/issues/503#issuecomment-490917622
But:
Maybe that would fall under:
> All packages whose upstreams have no mechanism to build against syst
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #8 from Artem ---
Few quick fixes:
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl-0.6-6.fc30.src.rpm
Now most interesting part:
* unbundling LuaJIT
* should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #7 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
1. LuaJit must be unbundled. Fedora already contains it as luajit package:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/luajit
2. License: MIT and Public Domain and BSD
3. Official tarball contains binaries in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #6 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
License check:
*No copyright* Public domain
howl-0.6/src/deps/LuaJIT-2.1.0-beta3/src/lj_alloc.c
Expat License Public domain
---
howl-0.6/src/deps/Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #4 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
> Some rpmlint errors
Just remove this examples.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
Some rpmlint errors
https://github.com/howl-editor/howl/issues/501#issuecomment-484565885
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
--- Comment #2 from Artem ---
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/howl-0.6-4.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701204
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vit...@easycoding.org
--- Comment #1
23 matches
Mail list logo
