https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
Ryan Curtin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #25 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Everything's stable now; can't we close this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
ensmallen-1.15.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
ensmallen-1.15.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
ensmallen-1.15.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
ensmallen-1.15.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
ensmallen-1.15.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-96c517757d has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-96c517757d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-b5dbfb1cb5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b5dbfb1cb5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ensmallen
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #14 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
No, it's approved already.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #13 from Ryan Curtin ---
Thanks! And you're right, I did change the spec file after building the SRPM,
but in this case I only changed comments. Sorry for any confusion.
Does anything else need to be done by me here? And thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #11 from Ryan Curtin ---
Ah, good point, disabling the SmallLovaszThetaSdp test is the better way to go.
I'll try to keep digging and report a bug to the right place.
The spec and SRPM are updated now; let me know what you think:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #10 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
That indicates a real error:
https://access.redhat.com/blogs/766093/posts/1976213 Please report a bug for
it.
Instead of disabling all the flags (and then possibly forgetting to re-enable
them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #9 from Ryan Curtin ---
It took a while but I determined that the CXXFLAGS used by the %cmake macro
cause the problem. Specifically, the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE option causes the
segfault. In any case, since ensmallen is not actually d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #8 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Well, unfortunately, it doesn't work on either Rawhide or F30 in koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35079859
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35080468
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #7 from Ryan Curtin ---
I tried reproducing the issue in an fc31 docker container by running the tests
over and over with different random seeds, but I wasn't able to reproduce it at
all. It does look like a lower-level Armadillo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Here is the backtrace if it's helpful? It looks like something is going wrong
in armadillo though.
#0 0x5564ebb4 in arma::Mat::~Mat (this=0x1,
__in_chrg=) at /usr/include/armadillo_bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #5 from Ryan Curtin ---
I should add, since ensmallen is header-only, the tests are primarily of
importance for ensuring everything compiles. They are also tests of the
internal optimizers, but given that during development the is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #4 from Ryan Curtin ---
Hi Elliott, I spent a while working with it but I can't reproduce the segfault
at all (I ran with tons of different random seeds). Do you think we should
then just ignore running the tests in this case?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Putting %package and %description all the way at the end there is a bit odd;
it's usually before %prep.
Unfortunately, the tests segfault for me:
+ ./ensmallen_tests
ensmallen version: 1.14.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Curtin ---
Hi Elliott,
Thanks so much for your quick review. I handled each of the issues you pointed
out and updated https://www.ratml.org/misc/ensmallen.spec and
https://www.ratml.org/misc/ensmallen-1.14.2-1.fc30.s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
26 matches
Mail list logo
