https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #25 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #15)
> - Not needed anymore:
>
> %ldconfig_scriptlets
>
> %ldconfig_scriptlets ipa
>
> - %{_libdir}/libcamera*.so should be versioned, ask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Javier Martinez Canillas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #23 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #22)
> (In reply to Javier Martinez Canillas from comment #21)
> >
> > I will take on this bugzilla and try to move the libcamera packaging
> > forward.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #22 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #21 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to Nicolas Dufresne from comment #19)
> Hi Folks, as libcamera is not yet to a point were it can be released with a
> version, I would recommend going further then just the Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Javier Martinez Canillas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fmart...@redhat.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #20 from Dave Olsthoorn ---
Created attachment 1805238
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1805238=edit
libcamera patch for unstable name
Here is a patch adding the unstable postfix to the library name, it also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Nicolas Dufresne changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nico...@ndufresne.ca
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #18 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #17)
> > I wonder how we should proceed, if having a downstream patch to add a .so
> > name
> > versioning as suggested in Comment #3 (and deal with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson ---
> I wonder how we should proceed, if having a downstream patch to add a .so
> name
> versioning as suggested in Comment #3 (and deal with any fallout caused by
> the
> API/ABI to change before they cut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Javier Martinez Canillas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fmart...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Not needed anymore:
%ldconfig_scriptlets
%ldconfig_scriptlets ipa
- %{_libdir}/libcamera*.so should be versioned, ask upstream to do so or do it
locally for now. The unversioned should go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson ---
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libcamera.spec
SRPM:
https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libcamera-0.0.0-0.2.76a5861.fc34.src.rpm
koji:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson ---
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libcamera.spec
SRPM:
https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libcamera-0.0.0-0.2.76a5861.fc34.src.rpm
koji:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson ---
I'll update this review shortly.
Still no versioned releases as yet, I'll reach out to upstream and see what
their latest plans are, it's been a little while since I checked in with them.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
jask...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jask...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson ---
I have this on my list for post F-33 GA to revisit.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Dave Olsthoorn from comment #8)
> Since I was looking at libcamera for another project I rebased the spec file
> and made some other changes:
> - Add %check, it passed locally, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Dave Olsthoorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.olstho...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
NEEDINFO me when you're ready.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Peter Robinson has canceled Package Review
's request for Peter Robinson
's needinfo:
Bug 1738290: Review Request: libcamera - A library to support complex camera
ISPs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pbrobinson@gmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson ---
> - Ask upstream to add soname versioning to their library. If they refuse,
> do it downstream:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> #_downstream_so_name_versioning
I've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson ---
koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36835718
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1269538 (IoT)
Referenced Bugs:
27 matches
Mail list logo
