https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #13 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-stompest
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #11 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Thanks, the LICENSE file is indeed in the snapshot, but it wasn't in the
released tarballs. Updated.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-stompest/python-stompest.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #10 from Adam Williamson ---
OK, on formal review:
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[adamw@adam Downloads]$ rpmlint
python-stompest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #9 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Oh, right, I'm not used to shipping snapshots, thanks. Updated.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-stompest/python-stompest.spec
SRPM URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson ---
Versioning is wrong:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_snapshots
should be 2.3.0-1.20191017git715f358.fc32 (or whatever the actual date of the
snapshot is). Other t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #7 from Aurelien Bompard ---
OK, I'm shipping HEAD:
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-stompest/python-stompest.spec
SRPM URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-stompest/python-stompest-2.3.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson ---
I don't see any problem with shipping HEAD if it works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #5 from Aurelien Bompard ---
I tried that today but the patch only applies to the repo's HEAD, which is not
the latest released version. I'm considering shipping the HEAD, since a release
is unlikely to happen anytime soon.
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson ---
OK, so please do that, I don't think we should land the package in a state
where it's using a reserved keyword :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Yeah, it's a mess, I hope somebody will step up to maintain stompest. It's the
least unmaintained STOMP library for python I could find that has async
support.
I think it would be best to backport the r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|awill...@redhat.com
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awill...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
17 matches
Mail list logo
