https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-11afeac81d has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ca3b0196e1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ca3b0196e1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-11afeac81d has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-11afeac81d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-11afeac81d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ca3b0196e1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ca3b0196e1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vkBasalt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #10 from Artem ---
With ugly workaround again and sed'ing, but works. Should been fixed in meson
though and upstreamed.
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/vkBasalt-meson/fedora-33-x86_64/01746758-vkBasalt/vkBa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #9 from Artem ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/vkBasalt-meson/fedora-33-x86_64/01746646-vkBasalt/vkBasalt.spec
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/vkBasalt-meson/fedora-33-x86_64/0174
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
- This need to be versioned or maybe put in in a private directory with option
introduced in 0.3.2.3
%{_libdir}/libvkbasalt.so
- Bump to 0.3.2.3
- There are some ASL 2.0 files:
Apache Lic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #7 from Artem ---
vkBasalt ported on meson. 🎉
New build:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/vkBasalt-meson/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01726231-vkBasalt/vkBasalt.spec
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/res
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #6 from Artem ---
Oh this true. And our Meson port which was suggested to upstream could easily
solve this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package works fine locally in mock but does not at all in Koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39678033
On 32 bits arches you can't compile the 64 bits part and on other arches,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #4 from Artem ---
New commit still requires some work. I patched my build and it works and now
with proper build flags and debuginfo.
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vkBasalt/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01130150-vkB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
> - Why is this disabled? You need to investigate why debuginfo are not
> generated:
> %global debug_package %{nil}
I tried. :) And reported already few bugs, it was worse before. We even tried
to send PR with f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #1 from Artem ---
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vkBasalt/fedora-31-x86_64/01125716-vkBasalt/vkBasalt.spec
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/vkBasalt/fedora-31-x86_64/01125716-vkBasalt/vkBa
20 matches
Mail list logo
