https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
--- Comment #16 from Lars Kiesow ---
A f31 build is now on Bodhi:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d18e4b6803
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gron
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
--- Comment #14 from Lars Kiesow ---
Thanks, Neal! I will try to push forward from here and see if I can figure out
everything I need.
I will make sure to be annoying and ask if I am struggling somewhere ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #13 from Neal Gompa ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
--- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa ---
Nope, it looks good to me!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
--- Comment #10 from Dusty Mabe ---
The new spec seems to address any concerns I had!
Neal, anything you see that needs to be changed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
--- Comment #9 from Lars Kiesow ---
No, they aren't. Sorry!
The correct links are:
Spec URL: https://data.lkiesow.io/rpm/gron/0.6.0-2/gron.spec
SRPM URL: https://data.lkiesow.io/rpm/gron/0.6.0-2/gron-0.6.0-2.fc31.src.rpm
Koji build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
--- Comment #8 from Dusty Mabe ---
Thanks Lars!
I can't seem to access the spec file. Are those the right links?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Lars Kiesow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkie...@uos.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
--- Comment #5 from Dusty Mabe ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #4)
> Have you considered using "go2rpm" to generate this spec file? It produces
> Go packaging that is compliant with current packaging guidelines?
wow! go2rpm is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(lkie...@uos.de)
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Dusty Mabe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dustym...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
--- Comment #2 from Dusty Mabe ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Lars Kiesow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770566
Lars Kiesow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |31
--
You are receiving this mail
20 matches
Mail list logo
