https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
Breno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Breno from comment #9)
> So, regarding the puppet 6 requirement, cane is required by
> semantic_puppet[1] which is required by puppet.
It seems it is just developement dependency. It will be r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
--- Comment #9 from Breno ---
Hi Vít,
Thanks for your feedback regarding the testing.
I will check that with the upstream.
So, regarding the puppet 6 requirement, cane is required by semantic_puppet[1]
which is required by puppet.
Does it m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #7)
> Also, last but not least, it seems Cane upstream suggest to use Rubocop
> instead of Cane, therefore I wonder why are you trying to include Cane into
> Fedora?
Ac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
--- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch ---
This is a way to execute the test suite:
~~~
--- a/rubygem-cane.spec
+++ b/rubygem-cane.spec
@@ -14,10 +14,7 @@
BuildRequires: ruby >= 1.9.0
# for the tests
BuildRequires: rubygem(parallel)
-# BuildRequi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
--- Comment #6 from Breno ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/skywalkerz0r/rubygem-cane/epel8/rubygem-cane.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/rubygem-cane-testing/epel-8-x86_64/01252264-rubyg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Adam Borowski from comment #3)
> I'm not sure about the testsuite issue.
Yes, it would be nice to execute the test suite. Also, I would move the test
suite into -doc subpackage, because it is n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
--- Comment #3 from Adam Borowski ---
Issues:
===
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
= MUST items =
Generic:
[✓]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as def
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
Adam Borowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kilob...@angband.pl
--- Comment #2 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803276
Breno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 fr
11 matches
Mail list logo