[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-05-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #14 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinxcontrib-openapi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are al

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review?

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #12 from Fabien Boucher --- Add sorry. I've missed that. Fixed now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok --- That is correct, I've requested one final thing (might get lost in the wall of text): Please fix the summary and description: python3-sphinxcontrib-openapi.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C OpenAPI spe

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #10 from Fabien Boucher --- Thanks a lot for all those reviews. It was really helpful ! Now trying to request the repo, I get this: fedpkg request-repo python-sphinxcontrib-openapi 1812124 Could not execute request_repo: T

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Please fix the summary and description: python3-sphinxcontrib-openapi.noarch: W: summary-ended-with

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #8 from Fabien Boucher --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42530243 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and compone

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #7 from Fabien Boucher --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5) > Please add: > > %files -n python3-%{srcname} > %license LICENSE > %doc README.rst > Done. > > Also, there are test files under the ASL 2.0 license, but we

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #6 from Fabien Boucher --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4) > Is this necessary? > > sed -e '/.*use_scm_version=.*/d' \ > -e '/.*setuptools_scm.*/d' \ > -e '/long_description=.*/aversion="%{version}",' -i set

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok --- Please add: %files -n python3-%{srcname} %license LICENSE %doc README.rst Also, there are test files under the ASL 2.0 license, but we don't ship them in the built RPM. I suggest to note that in a comme

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok --- Is this necessary? sed -e '/.*use_scm_version=.*/d' \ -e '/.*setuptools_scm.*/d' \ -e '/long_description=.*/aversion="%{version}",' -i setup.py Also, %{__python3} can (should?

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #3 from Fabien Boucher --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1) > Source0:https://pypi.io/packages/source/%(c=%{pypi_name}; echo > ${c:0:1})/%{pypi_name}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}.tar.gz > > There is a amcor: > >

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok --- > There is a amcor: Should have been "macro" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component __

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 --- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok --- Source0:https://pypi.io/packages/source/%(c=%{pypi_name}; echo ${c:0:1})/%{pypi_name}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}.tar.gz There is a amcor: Source0:%{pypi_source} -

[Bug 1812124] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-openapi - OpenAPI spec renderer for Sphinx

2020-03-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812124 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|