https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818567
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|NEW
Assignee|hiw...@yahoo.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818567
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818567
--- Comment #4 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello Nicolas,
Sorry for my late reply because of my email filtering problem.
> Don’t ask me why the project stopped tagging new versions after 0.15 :(.
> Anyway, rolling back to 0.15 would depri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818567
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
Hi Hirotaka
Thank you for the kind review.
The last tagged version is 0.15, but the actual packaged state (a later commit)
is 0.16. If you open project fontlog, you will see the project version bumping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818567
--- Comment #2 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello Nicolas, please check the issues.
Thanks in advance,
Hirotaka Wakabayashi
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Man
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818567
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
