https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Thanks - no rush, alpha2 was only released last week so I think we've got
a few weeks to go.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #9 from Jerry James ---
Also, in order to update utop to 2.6.0 (the version compatible with OCaml
4.11), I'll need ocaml-lambda-term 3.1.x.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #8 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #5)
> Jerry, as we seem to be getting towards the end of the list of
> new packages, could you give me a quick summary some time of which
> new packages were
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #6 from Igor Raits ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-fieldslib
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Jerry, as we seem to be getting towards the end of the list of
new packages, could you give me a quick summary some time of which
new packages were added to Fedora in the end? (Too many emails ...)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to dan.cermak from comment #1)
> Sorry for taking so long to review this Jerry. I've found the following
> minor issues:
> - CONTRIBUTING.md is imho not necessary to include as %doc
Agreed. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
Oops. I meant this of course:
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-fieldslib/ocaml-fieldslib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-fieldslib/ocaml-fieldslib-0.13.0-2.fc33.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #1 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com ---
Sorry for taking so long to review this Jerry. I've found the following minor
issues:
- CONTRIBUTING.md is imho not necessary to include as %doc
- upstream's opam file notes the following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1833476
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjo...@redhat.com
Doc Type|---
16 matches
Mail list logo
