https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
Bastien Nocera changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/malcontent
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #11 from Kalev Lember ---
Looks good to me now, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #10 from Bastien Nocera ---
All done, same location.
Scratch build here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50989830
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember ---
Nice, thanks for the fixes! I'll let Andy do the final pass but looking good to
me :)
Just a few more remarks below:
(In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #8)
> (In reply to Kalev Lember from comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #7)
> I don't think there's any requirement for shipping a docs within all
> subpackages. It's just dumb rpmlint warning about not having docs and that
> warning is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember ---
I don't think there's any requirement for shipping a docs within all
subpackages. It's just dumb rpmlint warning about not having docs and that
warning is fine to ignore. rpmlint output doesn't 100% match
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #6 from Andy Mender ---
> What does "stand-alone subpackages" actually mean? All those depend on
> packages
> from the same SRPM which contain the README, and if those are considered
> "stand-alone" despite having deps on other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #5 from Bastien Nocera ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #4)
> > I've added a desktop-file-validate in %check, is that enough?
>
> Yup, that should be enough according to the packaging guidelines.
>
> > [ ]: Package must
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #4 from Andy Mender ---
> I've added a desktop-file-validate in %check, is that enough?
Yup, that should be enough according to the packaging guidelines.
> [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #2)
> > URL:https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pwithnall/malcontent/
> > Source0:
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #2 from Andy Mender ---
> URL:https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pwithnall/malcontent/
> Source0:
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pwithnall/malcontent/-/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
You can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199
--- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera ---
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50254466
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
15 matches
Mail list logo
