https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #33 from Gergely Gombos ---
FYI for those interested: package pipewire-codec-aptx is in RPM Fusion right
now (currently in testing, then stable). Please report any bugs you find in RPM
Fusion Bugzilla.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #32 from Gergely Gombos ---
For those interested, I submitted:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6088
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6089
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #31 from Gergely Gombos ---
Thanks for the POC repo! I haven't had time to look into it during the week,
but I tested, this is working well, it's enough to start packaging in
RPMFusion.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #30 from p...@iki.fi ---
Something like this
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pvir/pipewire-codec-aptx-rpm/
(not planning to maintain it though)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #29 from p...@iki.fi ---
The RPM build environment should have libfreeaptx present. Then you can do
`meson configure builddir` as usual, and after that `meson compile -C builddir
spa-codec-bluez5-aptx`. This generates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #28 from p...@iki.fi ---
So, yes, you need to package libfreeaptx also.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #27 from p...@iki.fi ---
From the logs it doesn't look like it installs freeaptx at all, and it's not
mentioned in spec file.
SBC-XQ is not comparable to APTX-LL, one has latency < 40ms, the other is >
150ms.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #26 from Gergely Gombos ---
Looks like it still needs to build with libfreeaptx.
I tried a scratch build [1] of pipewire without the -D
bluez5-codec-aptx=disabled option [2]. It failed miserably, not finding the
library at build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #25 from Pablo Mendez Hernandez ---
It seems it's been already released :)
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/tags/0.3.35
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #24 from Gergely Gombos ---
Thanks for the heads up! Once 0.3.35 is out, I could package aptX codec for RPM
Fusion.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
p...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@iki.fi
--- Comment #23 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #22 from Neal Gompa ---
You're better off just doing pipewire-freeworld.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
ValdikSS changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@valdikss.org.ru
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #20 from Pasi Karkkainen ---
FYI: libopenaptx has been forked and replaced with libfreeaptx
(https://github.com/iamthehorker/libfreeaptx) due to problems with the
libopenaptx author and recent weird license changes.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #19 from Julian Sikorski ---
Would it make sense to make a pipewire-freeworld package in rpmfusion until
dlopening codecs work?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #18 from Gergely Gombos ---
At the moment, adding libopenaptx to rpmfusion doesn't look like a viable
alternative, because pipewire has to be built along with libopenaptx (like it's
built with libldac) to enable support.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
Linus Lewandowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||li...@lew21.net
--- Comment #17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bcot...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
Gergely Gombos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wtaym...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #13 from Ben Cotton ---
(In reply to Gergely Gombos from comment #11)
> Hi @Ben, any advancements on the legal review? Looks like this still is
> still blocking the FE-Legal ticket.
Not yet. I'll flag this with Red Hat Legal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
It's been forwarded to the appropriate people. We're waiting for the
resolution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #11 from Gergely Gombos ---
(In reply to Ben Cotton from comment #4)
> Ack on the legal review. I'll get the patent status verified and then update
> this bug.
Hi @Ben, any advancements on the legal review? Looks like this still
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #10 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #9)
> Yeah, the .pc files is borked:
> > prefix=/usr/lib64
> > exec_prefix=${prefix}
> > libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/include
> → this evaluates to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #8 from Gergely Gombos ---
Thanks for the suggestion. Renamed from -utils to -tools.
Spec URL: https://gombosg.fedorapeople.org/libopenaptx/libopenaptx.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
Hmm, that's true since this package is actually named by the library name.
Though `-utils` is weird compared to `-tools`.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #6 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5)
> This is a weird pattern. Usually the main package includes the utilities and
> a -libs subpackage includes the libraries. This can be observed even in the
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcot...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #3 from Gergely Gombos ---
I separated the CLI utilities into a subpackage.
Spec URL: https://gombosg.fedorapeople.org/libopenaptx/libopenaptx.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
Gergely Gombos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alebast...@gmail.com
Doc
33 matches
Mail list logo
