[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-03-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-03-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 --- Comment #8 from Mohan Boddu --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rttr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Sure, done one day ago https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32359 I will wait next week, probably some vacation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 --- Comment #6 from Sergio Basto --- by Step 7 of documentation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existing_contributors you need do: fedpkg request-repo rttr 1932616 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-02-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 Sergio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-02-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Thanks for spotting this issue. I've fixed locally. The packaging guideline enforces the name of the source package to be the same as the archive name. But it's possible for a library only

[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-02-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 --- Comment #3 from Sergio Basto --- Created attachment 1759462 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1759462=edit rttr.spec.patch Hi, Issues: === - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)

[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-02-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Spec URL: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/rttr.spec SRPM URL: https://dl.kwizart.net/review/rttr-0.9.6-3.fc33.src.rpm Description: Run Time Type Reflection Fedora Account System Username:

[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-02-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 --- Comment #1 from Sergio Basto --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - If (and only if) the source package includes the text

[Bug 1932616] Review Request: rttr - Run Time Type Reflection

2021-02-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 Sergio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com