https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-0b547d721b has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-bddba53e4e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-atd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Spec URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ocaml/ocaml-atd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ocaml/ocaml-atd-2.2.1-2.fc34.src.rpm
I ended up creating one (or two if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #5)
> This is the story: https://github.com/ocaml/dune/issues/2353
>
> So it's a dune bug and will hopefully be fixed at some point. I'd say you
> don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James ---
This is the story: https://github.com/ocaml/dune/issues/2353
So it's a dune bug and will hopefully be fixed at some point. I'd say you
don't need to do anything.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> > - Do you know why the atdj and atds META files are both empty?
> >
> no idea; should I just remove them?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - Do you know
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Do you know why the atdj and atds META files are both empty?
- The comment on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
15 matches
Mail list logo
