https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981978
--- Comment #8 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to woodhead from comment #7)
> suggestion: I would like to share a incompatible point between sip6 and sip5
> according to my usage of sip5 and sip6 on fc35.
> For example, the `enum DataType{
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981978
woodhead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||woodhea...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981978
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981978
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sip6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981978
--- Comment #5 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #4)
> Looks good. This package is APPROVED. Miro just barely submitted updates
> for F33 and F34 to make %py3_check_import available, so that %check script
> will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981978
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981978
--- Comment #3 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> Issues:
> ===
> - Since this package is intended to replace the sip5 package, shouldn't it
> have
> Obsoletes and Provides for sip5?
>
> - Please add a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981978
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Since this package is intended to replace the sip5 package, shouldn't it have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981978
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
