subject:"\[Bug 1998755\] Review Request\: pt2\-clone 1.32 \- ProTracker 2 clone"

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 Wen Liang changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Status|ASSIGN

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2023-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 Wen Liang changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(wenliang@redhat.c | |om)

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2023-07-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 Jonathan S. changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(wenliang@redhat.c

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2022-11-20 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 Wen Liang changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Status|ASSIGN

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2022-04-29 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving th

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2022-01-31 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 --- Comment #7 from Wen Liang --- For the item 3 mentioned above, I just noticed that there was no translation file included in the source, then you can skip adding the `%find_lang` macro. Thanks. ( Please ignore item3 above) -- You are rec

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2022-01-31 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 --- Comment #6 from Wen Liang --- For the item2 above, my solution would be: - Add `BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils` to help ensure the .desktop file safety and spec-compliance - the `install` and `file` section should be ``` %install %c

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2022-01-03 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 --- Comment #5 from Wen Liang --- Hi @js-fed...@nil.im, let me summarize what you need to change in the next step: 1.rpmlint detected some issues in the package. As suggested by rpmlint, you may change macOS into mac OS. You may also add cha

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2022-01-03 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 Wen Liang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 --- Comment #4 from Wen Liang --- (In reply to Jonathan S. from comment #2) > 1.) Given this package is new, I was thinking it should just contain a > change log that it was imported - with the date of it actually being > imported. Should I al

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 --- Comment #3 from Wen Liang --- Hi Jonathan, beyond the rpmlint issues, my package review was posted as following: Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST item

[Bug 1998755] Review Request: pt2-clone 1.32 - ProTracker 2 clone

2021-10-29 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998755 js-fed...@nil.im changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(js-fed...@nil.im) | --- Comment #2 from js-fed...@nil.