https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
--- Comment #14 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
*** Bug 2027417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d0d128e8f0 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d0d128e8f0 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
--- Comment #8 from Igor Raits ---
> I would love to but things are gonna keep breaking on a weekly if not daily
> basis and I just
> can't find the time for that right now. If netavark is going to be anything
> like podman,
> there would li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/netavark
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Jindrich Novy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Ji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
--- Comment #5 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/lsm5/netavark/-/raw/main/netavark.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gitlab.com/lsm5/netavark/-/raw/main/SRPMS/netavark-1.0.0~rc1-1.fc36.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #4 from Lokesh Mandve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Igor Raits changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor.ra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Jindrich Novy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(l...@redhat.com)
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
--- Comment #1 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Jindrich, the %autorelease and %autochangelog macros are recognized by koji, so
those should be ok.
Upstream depends on 3 versions of nix so that's why you'll see them listed in
Provides.
Binary strip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
15 matches
Mail list logo
