[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-11-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-wtforms-sqlalchemy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are alway

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-10-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík --- Thank you very much, Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Package must not depend on de

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-10-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-10-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 --- Comment #7 from Matej Grabovsky --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mgrabovs/python-wtforms-sqlalchemy/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04953760-python-wtforms-sqlalchemy/python-wtforms-sqlalchemy.spec SRPM URL: https://d

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-10-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík --- > I have no idea why that would be the case. Could it be a problem > with resolving package dependencies when running fedora-review? > python-sqlalchemy1.3 is a distinct package which, apparently, > aims t

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-10-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 --- Comment #5 from Matej Grabovsky --- > I think you should add `%license LICENSE.txt` as well. Blimey, I swear I added that line, but somehow I uploaded the wrong SRPM. Sorry about that, fixed now. > For some reason, the package depends on

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Kadlčík --- > %files -n python3-%{base_name} -f %{pyproject_files} I think you should add `%license LICENSE.txt` as well. According to the https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/ > %pyproject_save_

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Kadlčík --- When submitting a new build into Copr and pasting the spec file here, it is a good idea to post the new SRPM as well because Copr removes old results (your original SRPM URL returns 404 now). Posting new

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 --- Comment #2 from Matej Grabovsky --- Thanks for the review, Jakub. I've updated the spec file per your suggestion: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mgrabovs/python-wtforms-sqlalchemy/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04913047-python-w

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-09-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkadl...@redhat.com Status|

[Bug 2055622] Review Request: python-wtforms-sqlalchemy - WTForms integration for SQLAlchemy

2022-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055622 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkadl...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 fr