https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081057
Avram Lubkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DEFERRED
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081057
--- Comment #6 from Avram Lubkin ---
Thanks for the review! I've updated the spec for the summary and description. I
didn't get an error when I ran rpmlint locally. Curious what version of rpmlint
you're running and if you have any options set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081057
--- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca ---
There is also an issue with
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_pypi_parity
-- https://pypi.org/project/isomer/ is taken up by another project, and
according to the policy t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081057
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Not sure why fedora-review didn't pick them up, but there's a few rpmlint
errors:
isomer.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary isomer
isomer.noarch: E: description-line-too-long ISOmer is a utility for cr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081057
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an ope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081057
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request:isomer - |Review Request: isomer -
