https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-c850e93a42 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-4dd476ce11 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-c850e93a42 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-4dd476ce11 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
--- Comment #22 from Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Status|MODI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-4dd476ce11 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4dd476ce11
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-c850e93a42 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c850e93a42
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #19 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qucs-s
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
Alain V. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|alain.vigne...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Alain V. from comment #15)
> What is next step ? You request the repo ? I do something ?
Could you please take the bugzilla (i.e. assign it to yourself), because my SCM
request was dropp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #15 from Alain V. ---
What is next step ? You request the repo ? I do something ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #14 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Thanks for the review, I fixed the small S (hopefully) and used Recommends: for
the library, because I think it should be installed by default, although it can
be weak-dep.
Spec URL: https://jskarvad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
Alain V. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Alain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #12 from Alain V. ---
Thank you for this quick improvement, Jaroslav.
What I meant about summary and description is:
diff qucs-s.spec qucs-s.av.spec
35c35
< Summary: Qucs-s library
---
> Summary: Qucs-S librar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
Alain V. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/qucs-s/qucs-s.spec
SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/qucs-s/qucs-s-0.0.24-3.fc37.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #8)
> I would make qucs-s-library package with noarch *.lib files, on which main
> arch package would depend. I find a little suspicious
> xspice_cmlib/include/xs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Alain V. from comment #6)
Thanks for the review.
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #5)
> > Alain are you going to do full review?
> Sorry, I was totally AFK those past days.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pemen...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #7 from Alain V. ---
Summary:
I marked [!] on "Obsoletes, Provides" as I think this package should obsolete
the qucs package.
rpmlint has some suggestions for upstream...
Maybe a -library noarch subpackage can be proposed (in the s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #6 from Alain V. ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #5)
> Alain are you going to do full review?
Sorry, I was totally AFK those past days.
fedora-review is running ATM, and I am in the packager group. But, I am afraid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Alain are you going to do full review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/qucs-s/qucs-s.spec
SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/qucs-s/qucs-s-0.0.24-2.fc37.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #3 from Alain V. ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> (In reply to Alain V. from comment #1)
> > Unofficial Review:
> >
> > License: GPLv2+
> > is OK
> >
> > - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Alain V. from comment #1)
> Unofficial Review:
>
> License: GPLv2+
> is OK
>
> - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> Note: qucs-s : /usr/share/qucs-s/xspice_cmlib/include/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
Alain V. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alain.vigne...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been e
29 matches
Mail list logo