https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #99 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #98 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #97 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/50386
(separate request for f37 branch)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #96 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libblkio
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #95 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/50385
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #93 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
> [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
- I scratch-built the package in Koji which should cover this.
> libblkio.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.1-12
> ['1.2.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #92 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5216289
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2124697-libblkio/fedora-rawh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #91 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Argh, the %changelog version is wrong - will fix in my local copy.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #90 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.2.2-12.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #89 from Neal Gompa ---
Reviewing the spec, I see only one issue left:
> %{_libdir}/libblkio.so.1*
This is unnecessarily permissive. Change this to
"%{_libdir}/libblkio.so.1{,.*}" so that we ensure that we're talking about
"libbl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
|needinfo?(decatho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #85 from Stefan Hajnoczi ---
libblkio v1.2.2 has been released. It only fixes a version number
inconsistency, so there's no need to upgrade unless you noticed you're getting
1.2.0 version numbers instead of 1.2.1.
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #84 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.2.1-11.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #83 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Oh I see, you said to drop --locked, but not add --offline. That works too ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #81 from Fabio Valentini ---
Great, thanks for submitting that upstream. I've already updated the
rust-io-uring package in Fedora to 0.5.10.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #79 from Alberto Faria ---
io-uring 0.5.10 has been released. It restores compatibility with Rust 1.48 and
also makes the entire public API follow the usual SemVer rules, making the
"unstable" feature have no effect.
libblkio 1.2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #78 from Alberto Faria ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #77)
> > Upstream libblkio is trying to stay compatible with stable Debian, which is
> > still on Rust 1.48, but io-uring 0.5.9 requires Rust 1.51.
>
> I don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #77 from Fabio Valentini ---
> Upstream libblkio is trying to stay compatible with stable Debian, which is
> still on Rust 1.48, but io-uring 0.5.9 requires Rust 1.51.
I don't see how this affects the range of supported versions?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #76 from Alberto Faria ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #72)
> error: failed to select a version for the requirement `io-uring = ">=0.5.6,
> <=0.5.8"`
> candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.5.9
>
> This b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #74 from Fabio Valentini ---
> I wasn't very clear on exactly where I should add the new export,
> so I guessed.
Yeah, adding it in %build before calling %meson and %meson_build should do it.
I'll verify that the build flags are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #73 from Fabio Valentini ---
> ">=0.5.6, <=0.5.8"
Hum, that's kind of a very weird version restriction. I updated io-uring to
version 0.5.9 yesterday, so that explains why things are broken.
Usually you'd want to do just "0.5.6"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #72 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `io-uring = ">=0.5.6,
<=0.5.8"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.5.9
This build failure seems to be a problem with libblkio. I do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #69 from Fabio Valentini ---
It might be possible to partially work around this by writing the value of the
`%build_rustflags` macro to the RUSTFLAGS environment variable, with something
like:
export RUSTFLAGS="%build_rustflags"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #68 from Fabio Valentini ---
The problem is that RUSTFLAGS are not set automatically, and are not exposed
directly, but passed as environment variables to the cargo command in the
%cargo_build macro. So there's currently no way to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #67 from Stefan Hajnoczi ---
Thanks, Fabio!
The rpm could invoke cargo directly, although the build won't be 100% the same
as tested upstream. I think it's preferable to use meson instead of bypassing
it.
I think the build is alm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #64 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.1.1-9.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #63 from Fabio Valentini ---
Why didn't you do the same for pre-1.0 versions? The same restrictions apply
there.
For example, the "nix" crate will likely be updated to version 0.25.0 soon, and
using the >= 0.24.2 requirement you h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #62 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.1.1-8.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #61 from Fabio Valentini ---
It's not a typo, it's necessary to prevent the expression from matching 2.0.0
pre-releases.
Using just "< 2.0.0" would include versions like 2.0.0~beta.1, which is not
what "^1.0.44" means.
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #60 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #55)
> BuildRequires: (crate(cc/default) >= 1.0.44 with crate(cc/default) <
> 2.0.0~)
Does ~ here have a meaning or was it a typo?
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #59 from Fabio Valentini ---
No, cc was just an example, I was making a general statement about all Rust
dependencies that are listed as BuildRequires.
The automatically generated BuildRequires already include version specifiers
th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(stefanha@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #57 from Fabio Valentini ---
> Do we have any way to keep the two in synch automatically?
Yeah, that's what dynamic BuildRequires are for.
The macro that does that for cargo doesn't support workspaces / path
dependencies yet, thou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(stefanha@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #55 from Fabio Valentini ---
Note that using BuildRequires on Rust crates like this:
BuildRequires: crate(cc/default)
Might or might not do what you want it to do, because you didn't include
version requirements.
Not specifyi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #54 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.1.1-7.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #53 from Stefan Hajnoczi ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #50)
> (In reply to Stefan Hajnoczi from comment #49)
> > Hi Rich,
> > Is it possible to add the following to the rpm spec file?
> >
> > export CARGO_NET_OF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #52 from Stefan Hajnoczi ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #51)
> Both builds whinged about:
>
> + /usr/bin/meson --buildtype=plain --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64
> --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --bindir=/usr/bin --s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #51 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Both builds whinged about:
+ /usr/bin/meson --buildtype=plain --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin
--includedir=/usr/include --datadir=/u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #50 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(In reply to Stefan Hajnoczi from comment #49)
> Hi Rich,
> Is it possible to add the following to the rpm spec file?
>
> export CARGO_NET_OFFLINE=true # avoid the need to patch src/cargo-build.sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #49 from Stefan Hajnoczi ---
Hi Rich,
Is it possible to add the following to the rpm spec file?
export CARGO_NET_OFFLINE=true # avoid the need to patch src/cargo-build.sh
# Explicitly enable debuginfo and release build optimizati
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #48 from Alberto Faria ---
(In reply to Alberto Faria from comment #47)
> (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #44)
> > Scratch build FAILS for unclear reasons. It builds fine locally.
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #47 from Alberto Faria ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #44)
> Scratch build FAILS for unclear reasons. It builds fine locally.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94425117
Looks like a newer lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #46 from Stefan Hajnoczi ---
meson 0.64.0 added a new optimization level called "plain" that means "don't
set explicit compiler optimization options" (apparently nix needs this because
it controls the compiler options). libblkio's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #45 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
It builds fine against the f37 target:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94425359
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #44 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.1.1-6.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(stefanha@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(stefanha@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Bug 2124697 depends on bug 2140674, which changed state.
Bug 2140674 Summary: Review Request: rust-memfd - Pure-Rust library to work
with Linux memfd and sealing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140674
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #41 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.1.0-5.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2140674
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #40 from Fabio Valentini ---
Great, thanks for confirming that memfd 0.6 is fine as well.
I've submitted a re-review request for it here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140674
We already have rustix and all its depe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #39 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(and obviously memfd still too)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.red
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #38 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Looks like we have:
- https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-errno
- https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-io-lifetimes
- https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-linux-raw-sys
- https://src.fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(stefanha@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #36 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Also means backporting this package to RHEL is going to be painful,
but luckily that's somebody else's problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #35 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Oh I didn't think this would be related to C / kernel headers, but
yes you're right. I previously had
kernel-headers-5.19.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc37.x86_64,
but upgrading to 6.1.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc38 fixes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #33 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.1.0-4.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #32 from Fabio Valentini ---
I wonder what still pulls in the winapi crates?
memfd doesn't pull them in, and what we have packaged for Fedora has the
Windows-specific dependencies stripped from it.
> Weirdly this builds fine in Ko
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #31 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.1.0-3.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Bug 2124697 depends on bug 2138410, which changed state.
Bug 2138410 Summary: Review Request: rust-pci-driver - PCI/PCIe driver
development library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138410
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Bug 2124697 depends on bug 2138409, which changed state.
Bug 2138409 Summary: Review Request: rust-concat-idents - Allows concatenating
multiple identifiers and using them everywhere
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138409
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Bug 2124697 depends on bug 2138378, which changed state.
Bug 2138378 Summary: Review Request: rust-io-uring - Low-level io_uring
userspace interface for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138378
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2138409
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2138410
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #30 from Fabio Valentini ---
Review requests:
- rust-concat-idents: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138409
- rust-pci-driver: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138410
I'll wait with the re-review / unretir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #29 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Stefan, as well as the memfd version question, same question about
io-uring 0.5.6 vs 0.5.8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2138378
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #28 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Yes, just those 3 left once io-uring gets in.
I don't know the answer to the question about memfd version, hopefully
Stefan will reply to the needinfo with that information.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #27 from Fabio Valentini ---
Review request for the io-uring crate (with some changes to ensure it works
correctly on all architectures):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138378
Can you check whether the packages which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #26 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/libblkio/libblkio-1.1.0-2.fc37.src.rpm
Description: Block device I/O library
Fedora Acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(stefanha@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #23 from Fabio Valentini ---
I wonder why you're bundling num-traits? It's up-to-date in Fedora.
I also started to look at packaging the missing dependencies, and it looks like
the dependency on memfd is quite old (v0.4), upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #21 from Stefan Hajnoczi ---
Hi Rich,
libblkio 1.1 has been released:
https://gitlab.com/libblkio/libblkio/-/commits/v1.1.0/
It adds a virtio-blk-vfio-pci driver.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
It was really me pointing out that possibility, what you do is for upstream to
decide :-)
I think my question is are we going to go ahead with this package right now
(with bundling), OR shall we wai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(stefanha@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #16)
> - Will libblkio & blkio live in the same upstream repository or be
> split out upstream? I think this may have implications for how we
> packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(stefanha@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #15 from Stefan Hajnoczi ---
> I'll chase upstream about the i686 failure (if we care about that).
Alberto fixed the i686 build. libblkio 1.0.0 should build successfully now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #14 from Stefan Hajnoczi ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #1)
> Stefan:
>
> - Shouldn't this depend on liburing-devel? I added that
> as a BR, but I'm not sure if that is correct.
No. The io-uring crate directl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(stefanha@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #10)
> I can package the three remaining missing crates, if that helps you
> (concat-idents, io-uring, memfd).
Yes that would help. Cc me on the package re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
This is a bit better:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91736622
I'll chase upstream about the i686 failure (if we care about that).
This is done by "vendoring" the 6 missing dep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini ---
I can package the three remaining missing crates, if that helps you
(concat-idents, io-uring, memfd).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
> What does "unsure" mean in this context?
Just meant I had problems finding them initially in Fedora, but it
turns out they are in fact all present. I've just uploaded my latest
attempt at packagin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BIDRSE72WRGNCB7BY3JJFDWQ5UQZG53K/
Looks like we should use cargo-c to fix the missing symlinks.
--
You are receiv
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
