https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-305dbd0b01 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-bab930316f has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-bab930316f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-bab930316f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-305dbd0b01 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-305dbd0b01
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
Daniel Axelrod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jowl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Axelrod ---
Awesome, thank you!
Requested repo:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/47624
And branches:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/47625
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
Daniel Axelrod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2)
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
> in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127737
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
Status|NEW
15 matches
Mail list logo