https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-80e67e007e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-e264ab809d has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-c3901e45f6 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2cad5b084c has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-c3901e45f6 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-80e67e007e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-80e67e0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-c3901e45f6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c3901e45f6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nvtop
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Thanks!
specs/utils on master [✘?]
⬢ [fedora-toolbox:37] ❯ fedpkg request-repo nvtop 2139889
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/48787
specs/utils on master [✘?] took 4s
⬢ [
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dcava...@fb.com
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
spec updated with license breakdown. Also switched back to %autorelease /
%autochangelog (they were previously properly commented out with %%)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #1)
> You have autorelease/autochangelog commented out, either remove them or
> remove the manual release/changelog
I'll be enabling them for the imported
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Note: NVIDIA support is via dlopen, and this package is also functional on AMD
and Intel GPUs anyway
I can add some weak dependencies on the needed Nvidia libraries, but worried it
might mess up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
I think you need to update the license tag, here's the licensecheck output for
reference:
*No copyright* BSD 3-Clause License
---
nvtop-3.0.0/cmake/modules/FindLibdrm.cmak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
--- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca ---
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139889
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
20 matches
Mail list logo
