https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
Tomi Lähteenmäki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #22 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
If you plan build and add to repos for other releases (f38, f37, f36, epel9...)
you should request that branches.
You can close this ticket after rawhide build or after target release build.
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #21 from Tomi Lähteenmäki ---
SCM repository created and committed the sources for rawhide. Bodhi update
seemed to trigger automatically:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9449c4062f. Should I also
create f38 bran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/numberstation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #19 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215128
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1942002
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1942002&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5255606 to 5430141
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5430141
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2151289-numberstation/fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #16 from Tomi Lähteenmäki ---
Forgot to link latest SPRM:
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/numberstation/raw/master/f/numberstation.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/lihis/numberstation/fedora-37-x86_64/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #15 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Seems good now.
I will sponsor you. What is your FAS login?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #14 from Tomi Lähteenmäki ---
> 1. You must explay why explicitly disable debuginfo
Thanks for the link, now I know how to use it properly.
> 2. No need to describe each file and directory at %files section ...
Okay, that's good
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #13 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
1. You must explay why explicitly disable debuginfo
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_debuginfo_packages
If it is because package noarch than it is not needed. RPM will do it h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #12 from Tomi Lähteenmäki ---
Thanks for the review!
> 1. Why %global debug_package %{nil} ?
No reason, removed it.
> 2. Change
I'm not sure about what you exactly want, could you elaborate?
> 4. Add to %check section:
The ap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #11 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
5. Change %setup -n %{name}-%{version}
to %autosetup
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1939210
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1939210&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5252620 to 5255606
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5255606
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2151289-numberstation/fedora-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #6 from Tomi Lähteenmäki ---
Missed the sub-directory under the "%{_datadir}/%{name}" so pushed once more.
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/numberstation/raw/master/f/numberstation.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5252620
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2151289-numberstation/fedora-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #4 from li...@lihis.net ---
Thanks for the review!
The issues are now fixed and the package can be reviewed again.
However, I'm not sure about the rpmlint error "E: explicit-lib-dependency
libhandy". If it is not explicitly requir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pemen...@redhat.com
Status|NE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151289
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
B
24 matches
Mail list logo
