https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-c15f9d4a7d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-89c62dc3f4 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #19 from Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-c15f9d4a7d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-89c62dc3f4 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-2bf1e6c40c has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2bf1e6c40c
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-c15f9d4a7d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c15f9d4a7d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-89c62dc3f4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-89c62dc3f4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-2bf1e6c40c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2bf1e6c40c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
Charles R. Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ancient
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
Richard Fontana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #7 from Benson Muite ---
Guidelines are not clear on this. Full patent search seems difficult. Given
their age, expect not or if they had they are expired,
but for compression typically good to check. Raised an issue:
https://gith
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1946834
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1946834&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5355028 to 5575504
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/temisu/a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #4 from Charles R. Anderson ---
Thank you for the review. I have updated the package:
Spec URL: https://cra.fedorapeople.org/ancient/ancient.spec
SRPM URL: https://cra.fedorapeople.org/ancient/ancient-2.0.0-2.fc37.src.rpm
(In re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #2 from Benson Muite ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel mod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5355028
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165381-ancient/fedora-rawhid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381
Charles R. Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
23 matches
Mail list logo
