[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-abe9a1c6f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are o

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-0cdde78201 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are a

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-abe9a1c6f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-0cdde78201 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #42 from Fed

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #39 from

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #39 from

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-0cdde78201 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0cdde78201 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notifie

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/obs-studio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are a

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Carl George šŸ¤  changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Status|ASSIG

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5800381 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165399-obs-studio/

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Review Service --- Created attachment 1957940 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1957940&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5749313 to 5800381 -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #34 from Neal Gompa --- qsv11's license stanza has been extracted and collected as a license file now. Updated librtmp's license clause. Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #33 from Carl George šŸ¤  --- Several files in the outputs plugin have headers indicating they are Public Domain. You'll need to add LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain to your license field. -- You are receiving this mail because: Yo

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #32 from Carl George šŸ¤  --- Several files in the qsv11 plugin have the following header: This file is provided under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or redistributing this file, you may do so under either license. If I'm rea

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #31 from Neal Gompa --- License stanzas have been extracted and collected as license files now. Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio-2

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #30 from Neal Gompa --- Khronos EGL headers have been stripped: Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio-29.1.0~beta4-0.fc39.2.src.rpm -

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #29 from Carl George šŸ¤  --- > - deps/glad/include/KHR/khrplatform.h is identified by licensecheck as being > under the Khronos license. I don't see this on the Fedora allowed license > list [2]. It does look quite similar to the

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #28 from Carl George šŸ¤  --- What I've done in cases like that is: - extract the text of the license from the source file and include it in a text file - list that text file as an additional Source in the spec file - include a comme

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #27 from Neal Gompa --- Update to 29.1.0~beta4: Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio-29.1.0~beta4-0.fc39.1.src.rpm I've made further

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #26 from Carl George šŸ¤  --- The licenses and bundled libraries are still not fully addressed. - There is no license breakdown comment to indicate which files are under which license. - The bundled blake2 library is (CC0-1.0 or Open

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Created attachment 1956026 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1956026&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 573 to 5749313 -- You are receiving this mail because: Y

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5749313 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165399-obs-studio/fedora-ra

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #23 from Neal Gompa --- Update to 29.1.0~beta3: Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio-29.1.0~beta3-0.fc39.1.src.rpm -- You are recei

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/573 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165399-obs-studio/fedora-ra

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Created attachment 1955811 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1955811&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5737820 to 573 -- You are receiving this mail because: Y

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #20 from Neal Gompa --- Update to 29.1.0~beta2: Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio-29.1.0~beta2-0.fc39.1.src.rpm -- You are recei

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Created attachment 1955390 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1955390&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5726827 to 5737820 -- You are receiving this mail because: Y

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5737820 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165399-obs-studio/fedora-ra

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-04-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #17 from Neal Gompa --- Most of the feedback in comment 16 has been addressed with the below update. However, I want to point out a note of clarification: the deps directory does not necessarily imply it's third-party code. Some of

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #16 from Carl George šŸ¤  --- What's the purpose for setting __brp_check_rpaths to nil? Whatever it is please include it as a comment above the macro definition. What's the purpose of defining __python? The comment says it is to by

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5726827 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165399-obs-studio/fedora-ra

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Created attachment 1954465 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1954465&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5712616 to 5726827 -- You are receiving this mail because: Y

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #13 from Neal Gompa --- New build with some of the feedback addressed (still in progress) Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio-29.1.0~

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #12 from Davide Cavalca --- Other issues from a quick review: [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/512x

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dav...@cavalca.name --- Comment #10

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #11 from Davide Cavalca --- Created attachment 1953970 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953970&action=edit licensecheck -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are alwa

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5712616 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165399-obs-studio/fedora-raw

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Created attachment 1953968 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953968&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5541387 to 5712616 -- You are receiving this mail because: Yo

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa --- Now

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Carl George šŸ¤  changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@redhat.com Status|NEW

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-02-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Bug 2165399 depends on bug 2152402, which changed state. Bug 2152402 Summary: Review Request: librist - Library for Reliable Internet Stream Transport (RIST) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152402 What|Remov

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Jakub Kadlčƭk changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://obsproject.com/ --- Comment #

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa --- Another update: Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio-29.0.2-0.fc39.1.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #4 from Michael J Gruber --- Perfect, thanks Neal! A formal review should probably wait for the dependencies then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You a

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- There is work ongoing for migrating this package from RPM Fusion to Fedora. In particular, I'm also doing upstream work to adapt things for Fedora's constraints. The obs-x264 plugin (which is where the x264

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Michael J Gruber changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-01-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčƭk --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5356241 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165399-obs-studio/srpm-builds/0535624

[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

2023-01-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2152402 Doc Type|---