https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ac211d78f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-30d47d0fcc has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-00a7fd4c67 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-30d47d0fcc has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-00a7fd4c67 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-00a7fd4c67
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ac211d78f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ac211d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
> Looks like there were no .la or .a files to remove. It fails to build in
> mock. :)
Removed.
> Ok, so the only thing I found is that there are tests in the test/
> subdirectory.
> It'd be nice if they w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libheif
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Ass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #1)
> Drive-by comments:
>
> MUST: License tag needs to be updated to SPDX.
>
Fixed.
> Optional stuff:
>
> The spec layout is a bit unusual in tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600
--- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Drive-by comments:
MUST: License tag needs to be updated to SPDX.
Optional stuff:
The spec layout is a bit unusual in that subpackage sections include %files
lists. I'd rearrange to fol
17 matches
Mail list logo