[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are a

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ac211d78f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-30d47d0fcc has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are a

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64 See also

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3eadb47c64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notifie

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-00a7fd4c67 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are a

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-30d47d0fcc has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-00a7fd4c67 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-00a7fd4c67 See also

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ac211d78f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ac211d

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from F

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa --- > Looks like there were no .la or .a files to remove. It fails to build in > mock. :) Removed. > Ok, so the only thing I found is that there are tests in the test/ > subdirectory. > It'd be nice if they w

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libheif -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are alway

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- C

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Ass

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #1) > Drive-by comments: > > MUST: License tag needs to be updated to SPDX. > Fixed. > Optional stuff: > > The spec layout is a bit unusual in tha

[Bug 2178600] Review Request: libheif - HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder

2023-03-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600 --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Drive-by comments: MUST: License tag needs to be updated to SPDX. Optional stuff: The spec layout is a bit unusual in that subpackage sections include %files lists. I'd rearrange to fol