https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-88a95f3a92 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #43 from Nikola Forró ---
Ops, I will add:
Provides: bundled(python3dist(botocore)) = 2.0.0
Provides: bundled(python3dist(s3transfer)) = 0.5.1
I hope I didn't miss something else. Also, let me see if I can try unbundling
s3tran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Igor Raits changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor.ra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #42 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #41 from Nikola Forró ---
I don't think that's realistic, EL 8 doesn't support pyproject macros, so
almost the entire spec file would have to be rewritten, not to mention outdated
dependencies.
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Dagan McGregor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla.red...@sudo.nz
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-dc0b65d976 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #38 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #36 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #36 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/awscli2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #34 from Nikola Forró ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218942
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1962188
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1962188&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5872293 to 5872722
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5872722
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2189420-awscli2/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #30 from Nikola Forró ---
Thanks, I missed that as it's usually handled by %pyproject_save_files, but I
guess it doesn't work with flit-core build backend.
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/awscli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #29 from Neal Gompa ---
The remaining issue is that the license files aren't captured in the file list
using %license.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5872293
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2189420-awscli2/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1962118
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1962118&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5870259 to 5872293
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #26 from Nikola Forró ---
I forgot to remove the fdupes build requirement.
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/awscli2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05870681-awscli2/awscli2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5870259
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2189420-awscli2/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1961974
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1961974&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5866524 to 5870259
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #23 from Nikola Forró ---
Removed python3-mock:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/awscli2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05870070-awscli2/awscli2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #22 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Nikola Forró from comment #21)
> Thanks, let me take care of that.
>
> > There's also a lot of duplicate files, which can be cleaned up with %fdupes
> > by adding "BuildRequires: fdupes" and "%
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #21 from Nikola Forró ---
Thanks, let me take care of that.
> There's also a lot of duplicate files, which can be cleaned up with %fdupes
> by adding "BuildRequires: fdupes" and "%fdupes -s
> %{buildroot}%{python3_sitelib}" at the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #20 from Neal Gompa ---
A couple of things here:
> BuildRequires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-mock
This package is deprecated and this needs to be migrated to unittest.mock:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1961619
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1961619&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5852118 to 5866524
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5866524
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2189420-awscli2/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #17 from Nikola Forró ---
Updated to 2.11.16.
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/awscli2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05866472-awscli2/awscli2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/res
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #16 from David Duncan ---
just adding my 2-cents to the move. This looks great and works with the new
method that the upstream project put together. We would have needed a new
review. If you would like a co-maintainer, I am happy t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5852118
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2189420-awscli2/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1960150
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1960150&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5851296 to 5852118
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #13 from Nikola Forró ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/awscli2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05852030-awscli2/awscli2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/awscli2/f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Nikola Forró from comment #11)
> > Obsoletes is needed here too, otherwise it's not an upgrade path.
>
> Hm, can I use dynamic version here?
>
> Obsoletes: awscli-2 < %{version}-%{release}
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #11 from Nikola Forró ---
> Obsoletes is needed here too, otherwise it's not an upgrade path.
Hm, can I use dynamic version here?
Obsoletes: awscli-2 < %{version}-%{release}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa ---
> # provide an upgrade path from awscli-2 (Amazon Linux)
> Provides: awscli-2 = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes is needed here too, otherwise it's not an upgrade path.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5851296
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2189420-awscli2/fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1960074
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1960074&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5847629 to 5851296
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #7 from Nikola Forró ---
Ok, I've added a provide.
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/awscli2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05851145-awscli2/awscli2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Stewart Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||traw...@amazon.com
--- Comment #6 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #5 from Nikola Forró ---
> Taking this review.
Thanks.
> Are we getting rid of awscli v1?
In Fedora, yes, eventually, but not in EPEL, see bug #2049808 comment 2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
> Provides: awscli = %{version}-%{release}
> Obsoletes: awscli < 2
Are we getting rid of awscli v1?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/aws/aws-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
Nikola Forró changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davd...@amazon.com
--- Comment #1 from
45 matches
Mail list logo
