https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #9 from Benson Muite ---
spec: https://ibotty.fedorapeople.org/loguru.spec
srpm: https://ibotty.fedorapeople.org/loguru-2.1.0-1.20230406git.fc41.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #11 from Benson Muite ---
Review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269966 would be
appreciated if time allows.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #13 from Ben Beasley ---
I just submitted the same package for review in bug 2276336. I also submitted
the public-domain text for review so that the license can be
(LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain OR Unlicense):
https://gitlab.com/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(m...@ibotty.net)
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Tobias Florek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@ibotty.net)|
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Florek
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Florek ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #10)
> Package Review
> [...]
I totally missed that comment. Sorry. Thank you for the review! I'll look
into it next week after my holiday.
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #17 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Tobias Florek from comment #15)
> I honestly don't care. I am usually streched thin on time, but this package
> won't need much maintenance. I am totally fine with co-maintainership as
> well
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Florek ---
Given that, it might make sense to use your spec I suppose. Should I just
close this bug as duplicate of yours and you reopen your bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #19 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #17)
> I exclude i686 from the beginning under
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval, so I don’t
> need fix-build-on-odd-archs.patch.
Sorry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #20 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Tobias Florek from comment #18)
> Given that, it might make sense to use your spec I suppose. Should I just
> close this bug as duplicate of yours and you reopen your bug?
It is up to you. Wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #21 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #20)
> (In reply to Tobias Florek from comment #18)
> > Given that, it might make sense to use your spec I suppose. Should I just
> > close this bug as duplicate of yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #22 from Tobias Florek ---
Sorry for taking so long. The package I care about dropped the loguru
dependency, so I don't care that much anymore. I would still co-maintain this
package if you like.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #23 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Tobias Florek from comment #22)
> Sorry for taking so long. The package I care about dropped the loguru
> dependency, so I don't care that much anymore. I would still co-maintain
> this packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #24 from Tobias Florek ---
(In reply to Tobias Florek from comment #18)
> Given that, it might make sense to use your spec I suppose. Should I just
> close this bug as duplicate of yours and you reopen your bug?
I think it's bett
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Tobias Florek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/emilk/lo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Tobias Florek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Florek ---
I don't know what the last comment does. This is not waiting for something
from me, I hope. If so, I would be glad if someone can give me some pointers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #5 from Benson Muite ---
It is meant to trigger a build of the rpm to check things are ok.
[fedora-review-service-build]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2022381
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2022381&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7111037 to 7179819
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268124
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Florek ---
> loguru-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libloguru.so.2
> libloguru.so.2.1.0
I copied most of the spec file from catch's spec:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/catch/blob/rawhide
26 matches
Mail list logo
