https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
Veronika Hanulíková changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
Jakub Jelen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7608631
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2279967-openpace/fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2037071
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2037071&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7553264 to 7608631
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #12 from Veronika Hanulíková ---
Comments fixed, but regarding the duplicated files, I've removed font
directories but left the png duplicates as it looks like they're used by both
bootswatch and bootstrap.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #11 from Veronika Hanulíková ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vhanulik/openpace/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07607577-openpace/openpace.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vhan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelen ---
Just a few notes and then I think we are good:
Wording:
- Development files with include files to develop applications
+ Development files with header files to develop applications
Duplicated files:
op
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2036695
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2036695&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7434587 to 7553264
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7553264
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2279967-openpace/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #7 from Veronika Hanulíková ---
Thanks for review, the comments should be fixed. The reported m4 macro is kept
there for some compatibility, as the AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is used only when LT_INIT
is not defined.
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #6 from Veronika Hanulíková ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vhanulik/openpace/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07552883-openpace/openpace.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vhanu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
Jakub Jelen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jje...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2032499
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2032499&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7434535 to 7434587
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #2 from Veronika Hanulíková ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vhanulik/openpace/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07434573-openpace/openpace.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vhanu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://frankmorgner.github
17 matches
Mail list logo