https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
Jonathan Steffan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
--- Comment #6 from tom@amd.com ---
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/amdsmi.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/amdsmi-6.2.0-1.fc41.src.rpm
Removed the %dir's
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Steffan ---
Issues:
===
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-
packages/amdsmi
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Steffan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
--- Comment #3 from tom@amd.com ---
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/amdsmi.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/amdsmi-6.2.0-1.fc41.src.rpm
For a refresh for review comments.
I looked into packaging esmi_lib_library and ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Steffan ---
[!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
This s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
Jonathan Steffan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
tom@amd.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rocm-packagers-...@lists.fe
