[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-11-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-30 13:21:49 EDT --- ruby-dbus-0.3.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 s

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-29 12:40:45 EDT --- ruby-dbus-0.3.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-16 19:50:55 EDT --- ruby-dbus-0.3.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 t

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-16 19:36:56 EDT --- ruby-dbus-0.3.0-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 t

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-14 13:34:00 EDT --- ruby-dbus-0.3.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-14 13:33:49 EDT --- ruby-dbus-0.3.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update fo

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-04-14 13:33:55 EDT --- ruby-dbus-0.3.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update fo

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-04-14 00:36:24 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Victor Bogado changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-04-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #13 from Michael Stahnke 2010-04-12 09:50:11 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/user

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-03-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #12 from Michael Stahnke 2010-03-31 16:45:23 EDT --- Thanks for the ping. Apparently I am not so good at keeping t

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura 2010-03-30 11:49:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Very sorry this fell off my radar. I

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-02-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Victor Bogado changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Michael Stahnke changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Michael Stahnke changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Victor Bogado changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2010-01-18 10:13:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > [...] if the original > packager is in

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 --- Comment #5 from Victor Bogado 2010-01-18 06:09:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > What's the state on this? > > I guess

[Bug 485178] Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client

2010-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added --