Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-10 19:48:59 EDT ---
JSCookMenu-2.0.4-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-10 13:02:00 EDT ---
JSCookMenu-2.0.4-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
Patrick Monnerat changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #20 from Patrick Monnerat 2010-05-07 09:52:30
EDT ---
Thanks Kevin.
Typo fixed and post/postun scriptlets removed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-07 09:37:13 EDT ---
JSCookMenu-2.0.4-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-07 09:37:06 EDT ---
JSCookMenu-2.0.4-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-05-06 11:10:44 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-05-04 23:27:00 EDT ---
Well, the only packages in the distro that do this are:
phpPgAdmi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #15 from Patrick Monnerat 2010-05-04 13:04:31
EDT ---
Well... this is a philosophical problem that could well degen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
Patrick Monnerat changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
Caius 'kaio' Chance changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #11 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-04-28
23:07:18 EDT ---
$ rpmlint SPECS/JSCookMenu.spec SRPMS/JSCookMenu-2.0.4-2.f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Monnerat 2010-02-24 04:24:13
EST ---
I agree with your new opinion about macro usage consistency:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #9 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-02-24
02:08:58 EST ---
The .spec and srpm looks okay to me, but you need to get a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-02-24
02:02:55 EST ---
MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
I was mis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Monnerat 2010-02-23 05:51:24
EST ---
Sorry to tell you, but I do not agree with this suggestion for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
Caius 'kaio' Chance changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Monnerat 2010-01-25 08:42:48
EST ---
License clarified by e-mail. E-mail added in %doc.
SRPM: http:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Monnerat 2010-01-22 12:10:10
EST ---
I got a reply on http://yuanheng.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=169
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #3 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-14 12:16:18 EST
---
Cool! I will follow up then.
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Monnerat 2010-01-14 09:57:09
EST ---
The current license is OK: this is "MIT modern style with subl
25 matches
Mail list logo
