https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #55 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Tim Fenn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #54 from Tim Fenn ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: CBFlib
New Branches: epel7
Owners: timfenn
InitialCC: timfenn
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System
2012-02-04 17:15:51 EST ---
CBFlib-0.9.2.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System
2012-02-04 17:16:00 EST ---
CBFlib-0.9.2.3-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #46 from Tim Fenn 2012-02-04 17:13:08 EST ---
git done, packages tagged/built for f15/f16/el6/rawhide.
OK to close?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System
2012-02-04 17:15:40 EST ---
CBFlib-0.9.2.3-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #45 from Jon Ciesla 2012-02-01 08:21:11 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #44 from Tim Fenn 2012-01-31 22:26:57 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: CBFlib
S
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Tim Fenn changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #42 from Tim Fenn 2012-01-29 23:12:19 EST ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> (-) rpmlint output:
> CBFlib-debuginfo.x86
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #41 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2012-01-23 04:56:39
EST ---
(-) rpmlint output:
CBFlib-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #40 from Tim Fenn 2011-12-30 18:56:34 EST ---
Sorry for my late reply, holidays and what not.
(In reply to comment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #39 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2011-12-21 23:44:26
EST ---
1) Are you sure that doc is under GPL2 (%files section,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #38 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2011-12-18 22:40:54
EST ---
Pong.
Sorry, my bad. Somehow missed comment 36.
I'm her
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-12-16 05:13:04
EST ---
ping Dmitrij?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #36 from Tim Fenn 2011-07-11 20:51:23 EDT ---
OK, I spoke with Takanori - I'll maintain this package with him as
co-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #35 from Tim Fenn 2011-07-06 16:45:18 EDT ---
Takanori, since you're also interested in PyCIFRW, would you like to t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #34 from Takanori MATSUURA 2011-07-06 10:10:28
EDT ---
Just for information.
My CBFlib package is available from
Sp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #33 from Tim Fenn 2011-07-05 18:38:31 EDT ---
Talked with upstream, pycifrw is no longer required. I've updated the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #32 from Takanori MATSUURA 2011-01-13 04:24:59
EST ---
After the discussion at legal ML, current PyCifRW is not fre
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #31 from Tim Fenn 2011-01-07 14:03:10 EST ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> drel.py is called at the line 8471 in src/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-06 07:57:46 EST
---
You can mail le...@lists.fedoraproject.org with details of the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
tjyuviaej changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #28 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2010-12-09 08:31:54
EST ---
1. What with License? "GPLv2+ and (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+)" i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #26 from Tim Fenn 2010-11-14 22:04:35 EST ---
(In reply to comment #25)
>
> A scratch build showing the failure:
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #24 from Tim Fenn 2010-08-25 23:06:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> You're not using $RPM_OPT_FLAGS for the ut
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-07-06 00:14:01 EDT
---
Nobody has ever signed on to do a review.
--
Configure bugmai
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn 2010-07-05 20:16:31 EDT ---
Is anyone still reviewing this package?
--
Configure bugmail: https:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #20 from Chen Lei 2010-03-11 23:02:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > I find that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #19 from Tim Fenn 2010-03-11 21:34:29 EST ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> I find that CBFlib tarball bundled some ex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #18 from Chen Lei 2010-03-11 03:32:36 EST ---
I find that CBFlib tarball bundled some external python modules(dREL-p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #17 from Chen Lei 2010-03-11 01:39:38 EST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Take that with a grain of salt, please. It
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt 2010-03-11 01:13:07
EST ---
Take that with a grain of salt, please. It's a draft and not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #15 from Chen Lei 2010-03-11 00:58:52 EST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > (In reply to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #14 from Tim Fenn 2010-03-09 21:11:46 EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Here's the u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #13 from Chen Lei 2010-03-08 22:39:28 EST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Here's the updated 0.9.0 version:
> Spec U
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn 2010-03-08 16:42:53 EST ---
Here's the updated 0.9.0 version:
Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #11 from Chen Lei 2010-03-08 07:40:59 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #10 from Tim Fenn 2010-03-06 17:21:00 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Who are you pi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #9 from Chen Lei 2010-03-05 22:18:16 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Who are you pinging? At least click the "Ne
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-03-05 09:53:48 EST
---
Who are you pinging? At least click the "Need additional inform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877
--- Comment #7 from Chen Lei 2010-03-05 08:49:11 EST ---
ping?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi
53 matches
Mail list logo
