[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #19 from Mihai Limbășan 2010-04-27 15:15:03 EDT --- Sorry for the MIA - real life issues prevented me from being ab

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #16 from Stefan Riemens 2010-02-02 09:08:06 EST --- Changelog entry: (forgot to add it, sorry) * Tue Feb 2 2010 Ste

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Stefan Riemens changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-02 08:23:23 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) > Alternatively, I'd be happy to

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Stefan Riemens changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-02 07:28:59 EST --- See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Josh Matthews changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-21 00:46:50 EST --- Needinfo has been set for over a month now; if there's no respo