https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
Jeffrey C. Ollie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james.hoga...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jgrulich's scratch build of kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062
for f22-candidate and
git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/kdevelop?#c8e2b9bc57f11e41f3dc6612cdbcc591078d9062
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #7 from Tom "spot"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
--- Comment #6 from Raman Gupta ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #5)
> Is there any update on clarifying the actual licenses for these files?
Does this Asterisk wiki page (dated 2014) count as clarification / evidence of
the O
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-14 10:02:27 EST
---
Well, sure, I'm familiar with the license of the works from opso
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2010-11-13 17:01:53 EST
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Oddly, the asterisk documentation i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532554
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-13 14:54:20 EST
---
Oddly, the asterisk documentation indicates this is non-free
(ht
10 matches
Mail list logo
