[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:23:27 EDT --- java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc12 has

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-13 15:28:38 EDT --- java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc13 has

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-05-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-26 22:25:15 EDT --- java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc12 has

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 12:23:13 EDT --- java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc13 has

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-25 12:23:05 EDT --- java-gnome-4.0.15-3.fc12 has

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-04-20 23:59:29 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). --

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #18 from Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se 2010-04-19 16:00:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se 2010-04-18 14:46:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) Ok, if

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-04-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #14 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-04-11 09:08:07 EDT --- Ok, if upstream are not worried about it, then

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-03-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se 2010-03-19 07:30:36 EDT --- - upgrade to 4.0.15 - remove jar

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se 2010-03-19 08:29:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Cool, do you

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se 2010-03-19 11:43:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) I'll make a

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #11 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-03-19 11:52:43 EDT --- I've started the process to become a sponsor

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se 2010-03-16 06:36:25 EDT --- Yeah, I'm still interested! The links

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #7 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2010-03-16 07:04:54 EDT --- Cool, do you still need sponsorship? If so,

[Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings

2010-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added